#Openbsd wol wake on lan upgrade
#Openbsd wol wake on lan pro

You are welcome to become engaged in We still need to design and maintain our infrastructure and talk with partners in this area. And once again and again when things fails. We have several servers around, mainly donated, bare metal and virtualized, but so far nobody provided us better alternative to have dedicated machinery to build lets say 500 images really really fast.

#Openbsd wol wake on lan upgrade

Network access upgrade is also planned, but not an urgent issue. Same internet access, same power consumption. It is a drop-in replacement for one server only. It is a win/win situation we offer compute and bandwidth and the community gets better quality. It is a shared access to a group of developers, professionally hosted in a secure DC. Oldschool because a single server somewhere cause a lot of issues and hides the rest of the costs (electricity, internet access.). A contrario my company today is providing the whole build capacity of OpenBSD ports (10+ servers). I have issues with the recent fundraising Armbian did for the build server, and have not participated to it (but also did not debate as I am new here) because to me this is old school and border line regarding governance. They are a part of Armbian Linux as unofficial builds.

others, mainly community, random person or vendor only supported builds. We tag boards with 'supported', where we pay attention and maintain them vs. But the problem is maintenance - if you don't have it, things surely starts to break down. For hardware that is supported, but its relatively easy to add another supported hardware - if supported in u-boot / kernel. We are focused to ARM single board computers, so you can only build it for those. A lightweight ' Yocto' / 'buildroot' which gives you opportunity to build your own Linux distro. We provide Debian / Ubuntu userland, slightly modified, improved and fixed.īut core of the project is build engine. which are just using low level support and distribute their distribution. And Kobol do support us in - I believe - best possible way they can.Īrmbian is not yet another Linux distribution like Debian, like Ubuntu, like Arch, like Manjaro and many small ones. I am not saying or judging how big role we are playing in this particular case, but we are supporting them, they are supporting us. I hope my answer above brings everything back to a collaborative mode and again happy to look at any options I can provide help at my level.Īrmbian is all about 'Kobol issue', kernel, low level support. Again new here, so maybe I am missing information.įor the tone, I will disregard, maybe my question triggered this level of response because of other threads I am not aware of within the forum and impolite users that are asking and never giving back. * While I understand the money part of the 'help' you are seeking, the page I am being referred to and the 3k/day mention while totally plausible need more transparency in such a community project.

* I have issues with the recent fundraising Armbian did for the build server, and have not participated to it (but also did not debate as I am new here) because to me this is old school and border line regarding governance.

#Openbsd wol wake on lan pro

* I do not have a pro usage of Arm (and by extension Armbian or any other distro) yet, currently just playing around and exploring capabilities on a personal basis so 'help' also means here filing a proper PR if it is something I can fix. Now regarding Armbian maintenance work and the cost, a few comments on this: I was really just trying to get info if someone has looked into this already and might have been missled by the fact that Kobol/Armbian formed this 'club' and this is where we can ask questions on both aspects hardware and software. * or an Armbian issue with the linux distribution. * Kobol issue: hardware (like the missing IC connection on the 2.5Gbps for it to work at 1Gbps) or firmware Not expecting this, but could have been a bit more clearer in my question.